Creation quality field guide

Plant better instructions.
Harvest stronger work.

Spores turns quality habits into practical role arrangements. Use the guidance as a starting structure, then change every role, support role, model, and route to fit the project.

Configure the Workbench Open Magic prompts

Quality multipliers

Small controls.
Compounding results.

01

Define the finish line

State the intended audience, usable deliverable, constraints, and proof of completion before assigning any box.

02

Separate creation from verification

Give drafting and fact-checking to different boxes so the model that made a claim is not its only reviewer.

03

Use support roles deliberately

A primary Writer with a fact-checker behaves differently from a Writer with an editor. Choose the secondary responsibility that protects the weakest part of the task.

04

Route evidence with the work

Every handoff should include sources, assumptions, unresolved risks, and the exact decision the next box must make.

05

Keep one authority source

Name the controlling brief, canon, specification, or dataset. Tell every role what wins when materials conflict.

06

Match response guidance to consequence

Use light guidance for variations, medium for production drafting, and heavy for architecture, verification, security, or irreversible decisions. This setting is passed as instruction text; it does not guarantee a provider-specific reasoning mode.

07

Ask for visible checks

Require acceptance criteria, edge cases, contradictions, and a concise verification record instead of an unsupported claim that work is complete.

08

Revise the route, not only the prompt

If results drift, change which role receives the work, what evidence travels with it, and what the supervisor must flag during its post-output review.

Suggested configurations

Start with a role chain.
Then make it yours.

These are suggestions, not locked presets. The Workbench keeps every functional assignment editable.

PROJECT CATEGORY

Fiction + worldbuilding

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Researcher → Writer → Critic → Reviewer → Verifier
Useful support roles
context-keeper, researcher-aide, editor, devils-advocate
Quality focus
Preserve canon, character causality, voice, and continuity before polishing prose.
PROJECT CATEGORY

Manuscript editing

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Critic → Writer → Reviewer → Verifier → Summarizer
Useful support roles
editor, context-keeper, fact-checker, formatter
Quality focus
Separate developmental, line, continuity, and final-proof passes.
PROJECT CATEGORY

Website or application

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Researcher → Coder → Critic → Reviewer → Verifier
Useful support roles
researcher-aide, tester, devils-advocate, formatter
Quality focus
Lock scope and acceptance criteria before implementation; verify behavior, accessibility, and failure states.
PROJECT CATEGORY

Game system

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Researcher → Coder → Critic → Verifier → Reviewer
Useful support roles
context-keeper, tester, devils-advocate, note-taker
Quality focus
Track rules interactions, progression, exploits, player feedback, and implementation constraints.
PROJECT CATEGORY

Research report

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Researcher → Critic → Writer → Verifier → Summarizer
Useful support roles
researcher-aide, fact-checker, devils-advocate, formatter
Quality focus
Separate evidence collection, claim testing, synthesis, and citation verification.
PROJECT CATEGORY

Curriculum + assessment

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Researcher → Writer → Critic → Verifier → Reviewer
Useful support roles
researcher-aide, editor, tester, formatter
Quality focus
Align objectives, instruction, practice, accessibility, and assessment evidence.
PROJECT CATEGORY

Image campaign

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Researcher → Writer → Critic → Reviewer → Verifier
Useful support roles
context-keeper, researcher-aide, editor, tester
Quality focus
Protect visual authority, subject identity, composition variety, and delivery specifications.
PROJECT CATEGORY

Video production

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Writer → Voice → Critic → Reviewer → Verifier
Useful support roles
context-keeper, editor, fact-checker, formatter
Quality focus
Coordinate story beats, shot logic, spoken timing, continuity, and technical delivery.
PROJECT CATEGORY

3D asset pipeline

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Researcher → Coder → Critic → Verifier → Reviewer
Useful support roles
researcher-aide, tester, context-keeper, formatter
Quality focus
Carry scale, topology, materials, rigging, format, and engine constraints through every handoff.
PROJECT CATEGORY

Data analysis

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Researcher → Coder → Critic → Verifier → Summarizer
Useful support roles
fact-checker, tester, devils-advocate, formatter
Quality focus
Protect data provenance, assumptions, reproducibility, uncertainty, and interpretation.
PROJECT CATEGORY

Security review

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Researcher → Coder → Critic → Verifier → Reviewer
Useful support roles
devils-advocate, tester, fact-checker, note-taker
Quality focus
Separate discovery, exploitability analysis, validation, remediation, and regression checks.
PROJECT CATEGORY

Product launch

Suggested primary chain
Planner → Researcher → Writer → Critic → Voice → Verifier
Useful support roles
researcher-aide, fact-checker, editor, context-keeper
Quality focus
Keep audience, claims, positioning, channel format, and launch evidence consistent.